Market SeasonalityEmail us
Not investment advice. Seasonal statistics describe the past and are for information only. We never tell you what to buy or sell.Disclaimer
Compare

Nvidia vs Microsoft: which is stronger each month?

Nvidia has been strongest in May (+10.91%) and weakest in September (-1.65%). Microsoft has been strongest in January (+5.07%) and weakest in February (-0.76%). Nvidia had the higher average in 7 of 12 months, and the two pointed the same way in 8 of 12.

Month by month

MonthNvidia averageNvidia up yearsMicrosoft averageMicrosoft up yearsStronger
January+3.51%42%+5.07%65%Microsoft
February+7.69%70%-0.76%45%Nvidia
March+4.73%54%+2.88%65%Nvidia
April+0.40%57%+3.54%68%Microsoft
May+10.91%75%+3.13%66%Nvidia
June-1.07%50%+1.87%56%Microsoft
July-1.43%54%+0.31%54%Microsoft
August+7.78%75%+1.88%64%Nvidia
September-1.65%61%+0.65%59%Microsoft
October+5.54%59%+4.89%65%Nvidia
November+9.79%78%+2.89%63%Nvidia
December+3.32%63%+1.58%59%Nvidia

Nvidia since 1999, Microsoft since 1986, monthly close to close, as of October 16, 2026. The highlighted row is the current month. Monthly correlation over the last 16 years: 0.49.

More on each market

Questions

What is the best month for Nvidia?

Since 1999, May has averaged +10.91% for Nvidia, higher in 75% of 28 years.

What is the best month for Microsoft?

Since 1987, January has averaged +5.07% for Microsoft, higher in 65% of 40 years.

Do Nvidia and Microsoft move together?

Over the last 16 years their monthly moves had a correlation of 0.49, where 1 means they always move together and 0 means no link.

History describes the past. Not investment advice.

Questions, ideas or corrections?

Write to us. We read every email.

hello@marketseasonality.com

Not investment advice. Market Seasonality publishes historical statistics, news summaries and scenario analysis for information and education. Past patterns do not guarantee future results. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset, and scenarios describe possible paths without predicting them. See the disclaimer and methodology.