Market SeasonalityEmail us
Not investment advice. Seasonal statistics describe the past and are for information only. We never tell you what to buy or sell.Disclaimer
Compare

Apple vs Microsoft: which is stronger each month?

Apple has been strongest in October (+6.17%) and weakest in September (-3.77%). Microsoft has been strongest in January (+5.07%) and weakest in February (-0.76%). Apple had the higher average in 6 of 12 months, and the two pointed the same way in 9 of 12.

Month by month

MonthApple averageApple up yearsMicrosoft averageMicrosoft up yearsStronger
January+3.59%57%+5.07%65%Microsoft
February+1.68%54%-0.76%45%Apple
March+2.20%50%+2.88%65%Microsoft
April+3.65%59%+3.54%68%Apple
May+2.50%54%+3.13%66%Microsoft
June-1.94%46%+1.87%56%Microsoft
July+3.19%63%+0.31%54%Apple
August+5.38%63%+1.88%64%Apple
September-3.77%38%+0.65%59%Microsoft
October+6.17%69%+4.89%65%Apple
November+2.91%56%+2.89%63%Apple
December+1.45%60%+1.58%59%Microsoft

Apple since 1981, Microsoft since 1986, monthly close to close, as of October 16, 2026. The highlighted row is the current month. Monthly correlation over the last 16 years: 0.49.

More on each market

Questions

What is the best month for Apple?

Since 1981, October has averaged +6.17% for Apple, higher in 69% of 45 years.

What is the best month for Microsoft?

Since 1987, January has averaged +5.07% for Microsoft, higher in 65% of 40 years.

Do Apple and Microsoft move together?

Over the last 16 years their monthly moves had a correlation of 0.49, where 1 means they always move together and 0 means no link.

History describes the past. Not investment advice.

Questions, ideas or corrections?

Write to us. We read every email.

hello@marketseasonality.com

Not investment advice. Market Seasonality publishes historical statistics, news summaries and scenario analysis for information and education. Past patterns do not guarantee future results. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset, and scenarios describe possible paths without predicting them. See the disclaimer and methodology.